11/25/2023 0 Comments Calibre software 3.30 reviewSo knowledge of peer review, knowledge of how to do it as well as how to have it done to you is really important. It’s unpaid labour, sometimes it’s anonymous, sometimes it’s identifiable, but we as researchers make up those peer review panels. We often think of peer review as something done to us when we submit our research – when we put our heads above the parapet – and decide to disseminate our outputs, our conclusions, our findings, and then these mysterious cabals of peer reviewers have a look at our work and they decide whether it passes muster or not, but actually peer review is done by the research community. What does peer review mean for the research community? Why does it matter, what are its strengths and weaknesses, and what are the different approaches to peer review? The transcript below has been edited for clarity and to add images and links. The session opened with a presentation from the UKRIO Chief Executive, James Parry, discussing the concepts of research integrity and the work of UKRIO. Magdalena Morawska, Research Policy and Governance Officer, UCL ( slides)Ĭaroline Porter, SAGE Publishing and COPE Trustee ( slides)Ġ2:21 James Parry – Introduction to research integrity and UKRIOġ4:15 Matt Hodgkinson – Introduction to the panelġ6:03 Gowri Gopalakrishna – National survey on research integrityĢ4:15 John Carlisle – Experiences editing Anaesthesiaģ1:40 Caroline Porter – How can peer review support integrity?ģ8:00 Magdalena Morawska – Better research and research culture John Carlisle, ‘Data detective’ and NHS anaesthetist, Torquay Gowri Gopalakrishna, Amsterdam University Medical Center ( slides) Matt Hodgkinson, Research Integrity Manager at UKRIO and EASE Treasurer, chaired the webinar with contributions on the panel from: Introduction by James Parry, Chief Executive of UKRIO ( slides). Thank you to Iratxe Puebla of the EASE Peer Review Committee for co-organising the panel, EASE Secretary Mary Hodgson for hosting and running the webinar, EASE President Duncan Nicolas for editing and uploading the video, and UKRIO Senior Research Integrity Manager Josephine Woodhams for helping with the Q&A. In this Peer Review Week webinar, speakers bringing the perspective of journals, researchers and institutions shared their experience handling integrity cases and discussed the role of peer review in driving integrity and trust in research. But can we expect peer review to detect all possible deviations from rigorous research practices? Where does peer review fit within broader steps by different stakeholders to drive integrity in research? Peer review can also identify ethical concerns about the design, completion or communication of research. Peer review plays an important role in researcher education, for example by fostering use and compliance with reporting guidelines. Through its important role to evaluate and vet research works prior to their publication, peer review is one of the steps that can support awareness of research best practices and compliance with integrity requirements. Over the last few years, there has been increasing attention to research integrity, and to the need to develop best practices and incentive structures that encourage and support integrity in research. This year’s theme was “Research Integrity: Creating and supporting trust in research.” The video of the panel, an edited transcript, and the slides are below. How can peer review support research integrity? EASE/UKRIO Peer Review Week webinar Wednesday, 21 September 2022 2pm-3.30pm (UK time)ĮASE (the European Association of Science Editors) and UKRIO joined forces to host an online panel discussion for Peer Review Week 2022.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |